On 6 Feb 2011, at 03:14, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I'm thinking either Solaris' appalling mess of device files is somehow scrod,
> or else ZFS is confused in its reporting (perhaps because of cache file
> contents?). Is there anything I can do about either of these? Does devfsadm
> really c
Solaris and/or ZFS are badly confused about drive IDs. The "c5t0d0"
names are very far removed from the real world, and possibly they've
gotten screwed up somehow. Is devfsadm supposed to fix those, or does
it only delete excess?
Reason I believe it's confused:
zpool status shows mirror-0 o
