Excellent thanks to you both. I knew of both those methods and wanted
to make sure i wasn't missing something!
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> **
> On 9/26/2012 11:18 AM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
>
> If the added device is slower, you will experience a slight drop in
On 9/26/2012 11:18 AM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
If the added device is slower, you will experience a slight drop in
per-op performance, however, if your working set needs another SSD,
overall it might improve your throughput (as the cache hit ratio will
increase).
Thanks for your
On 09/26/2012 05:18 PM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
>>
>> If the added device is slower, you will experience a slight drop in
>> per-op performance, however, if your working set needs another SSD,
>> overall it might improve your throughput (as the cache hit ratio will
>> increase).
>>
>
> Thanks for yo
>
> If the added device is slower, you will experience a slight drop in
> per-op performance, however, if your working set needs another SSD,
> overall it might improve your throughput (as the cache hit ratio will
> increase).
>
Thanks for your fast reply! I think I know the answer to this questi
On 09/26/2012 05:08 PM, Matt Van Mater wrote:
> I've looked on the mailing list (the evil tuning wikis are down) and
> haven't seen a reference to this seemingly simple question...
>
> I have two OCZ Vertex 4 SSDs acting as L2ARC. I have a spare Crucial SSD
> (about 1.5 years old) that isn't gett
I've looked on the mailing list (the evil tuning wikis are down) and
haven't seen a reference to this seemingly simple question...
I have two OCZ Vertex 4 SSDs acting as L2ARC. I have a spare Crucial SSD
(about 1.5 years old) that isn't getting much use and i'm curious about
adding it to the pool
