Re: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

Robert Milkowski wrote On 12/22/06 13:40,: Hello Torrey, Friday, December 22, 2006, 9:17:46 PM, you wrote: TM> Roch - PAE wrote: The fact that most FS do not manage the disk write caches does mean you're at risk of data lost for those FS. TM> Does ZFS? I thought it just turned it on in

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

Hello Torrey, Friday, December 22, 2006, 9:17:46 PM, you wrote: TM> Roch - PAE wrote: >> >> The fact that most FS do not manage the disk write caches >> does mean you're at risk of data lost for those FS. TM> Does ZFS? I thought it just turned it on in the places where we had TM> previously tu

Re: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

Roch - PAE wrote: The fact that most FS do not manage the disk write caches does mean you're at risk of data lost for those FS. Does ZFS? I thought it just turned it on in the places where we had previously turned if off. ___ zfs-discuss mailing

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

Robert Milkowski writes: > Hello przemolicc, > > Friday, December 22, 2006, 10:02:44 AM, you wrote: > > ppf> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:45:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: > >> Hello Shawn, > >> > >> Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote: > >> > >> SJ> All, > >> >

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

Hello przemolicc, Friday, December 22, 2006, 10:02:44 AM, you wrote: ppf> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:45:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: >> Hello Shawn, >> >> Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote: >> >> SJ> All, >> >> SJ> I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction w

Re: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:45:34PM +0100, Robert Milkowski wrote: > Hello Shawn, > > Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote: > > SJ> All, > > SJ> I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction when using > SJ> two LUNS from a SAN. But, does it provide you with less features >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

Hello Shawn, Thursday, December 21, 2006, 4:28:39 PM, you wrote: SJ> All, SJ> I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction when using SJ> two LUNS from a SAN. But, does it provide you with less features SJ> than UFS does on one LUN from a SAN (i.e is it less stable). With only one LUN

[zfs-discuss] Difference between ZFS and UFS with one LUN from a SAN

All, I understand that ZFS gives you more error correction when using two LUNS from a SAN. But, does it provide you with less features than UFS does on one LUN from a SAN (i.e is it less stable). Thanks, Shawn This message posted from opensolaris.org