On 10/05/2010 13:35, P-O Yliniemi wrote:
Darren J Moffat skrev 2010-05-10 10:58:
On 08/05/2010 21:45, P-O Yliniemi wrote:
I have noticed that dedup is discussed a lot in this list right now..
Starting to experiment with dedup=on, I feel it would be interesting in
knowing exactly how efficient
Darren J Moffat skrev 2010-05-10 10:58:
On 08/05/2010 21:45, P-O Yliniemi wrote:
I have noticed that dedup is discussed a lot in this list right now..
Starting to experiment with dedup=on, I feel it would be interesting in
knowing exactly how efficient dedup is. The problem is that I've found
n
On 08/05/2010 21:45, P-O Yliniemi wrote:
I have noticed that dedup is discussed a lot in this list right now..
Starting to experiment with dedup=on, I feel it would be interesting in
knowing exactly how efficient dedup is. The problem is that I've found
no way of checking this per file system. I
I have noticed that dedup is discussed a lot in this list right now..
Starting to experiment with dedup=on, I feel it would be interesting in
knowing exactly how efficient dedup is. The problem is that I've found
no way of checking this per file system. I have turned dedup on for a
few file sy
