Re: [zfs-discuss] Consequences of resilvering failure

2010-07-09 Thread Brandon High
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > The pool will remain available, but you will have data corruption. The > simple way to avoid this, is to use a raidz2, where the chances are far > lower for data corruption. > It's also possible to replace a drive while the failed / f

Re: [zfs-discuss] Consequences of resilvering failure

2010-07-06 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
- Original Message - > I'm just about to start using ZFS in a RAIDZ configuration for a home > file server (mostly holding backups), and I wasn't clear on what > happens if data corruption is detected while resilvering. For example: > let's say I'm using RAIDZ1 and a drive fails. I pull it

[zfs-discuss] Consequences of resilvering failure

2010-07-06 Thread Michael Johnson
I'm just about to start using ZFS in a RAIDZ configuration for a home file server (mostly holding backups), and I wasn't clear on what happens if data corruption is detected while resilvering. For example: let's say I'm using RAIDZ1 and a drive fails. I pull it and put in a new one. While res