On Jul 13, 2007, at 2:20 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Bringing this back towards ZFS-land, I think that
>> there are some clever
>> things we can do with snapshots and clones. But the
>> age-old problem
>> of arbitration rears its ugly head. I think I could
>> write an option to expose
>>
> Bringing this back towards ZFS-land, I think that
> there are some clever
> things we can do with snapshots and clones. But the
> age-old problem
> of arbitration rears its ugly head. I think I could
> write an option to expose
> ZFS snapshots to read-only clients. But in doing so,
> I don't
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:54:37AM -0600, Dean Roehrich wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 07:23:44AM -0800, Thomas Roach wrote:
>
> And yes, we're actively pushing the SAM-QFS code through the open-source
> process. Here's the first blog entry:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/entry/welcome_to_sam
