I see now that a detail in my first post was incorrect, one of the disks is a
1.5 TB-disk, so the pool is thus 4 x 1.5 TB. So zpool reports total space
including parity. It makes sense then!
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-
On 06/06/11 08:07, Cyril Plisko wrote:
zpool reports space usage on disks, without taking into account RAIDZ overhead.
zfs reports net capacity available, after RAIDZ overhead accounted for.
Yup. Going back to the original numbers:
nebol@filez:/$ zfs list tank2
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOU
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Johan Eliasson
wrote:
> I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto
> them.
> And then I noticed that I've somehow lost a full TB of space. Why?
zpool reports space usage on disks, without taking into account RAIDZ overhead.
zfs r
I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto
them.
And then I noticed that I've somehow lost a full TB of space. Why?
nebol@filez:/$ zfs list tank2
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
tank2 3.12T 902G 32.9K /tank2
nebol@filez:/$ zpool list tank2
NAMES
