Kyle McDonald wrote:
> > Apple can currently just take the ZFS CDDL code and incorporate it
> > (like they did with DTrace), but it may be that they wanted a "private
> > license" from Sun (with appropriate technical support and
> > indemnification), and the two entities couldn't come to mutua
David Magda wrote:
On Oct 24, 2009, at 08:53, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The article that was mentioned a few hours ago did mention
licensing problems without giving any kind of evidence for
this claim. If there is evidence, I would be interested in
knowing the background, otherwise it looks to me
> Apple can currently just take the ZFS CDDL code and incorporate it
> (like they did with DTrace), but it may be that they wanted a "private
> license" from Sun (with appropriate technical support and
> indemnification), and the two entities couldn't come to mutually
> agreeable terms.
I
On Oct 24, 2009, at 08:53, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The article that was mentioned a few hours ago did mention
licensing problems without giving any kind of evidence for
this claim. If there is evidence, I would be interested in
knowing the background, otherwise it looks to me like FUD.
I'm gue
Alex Blewitt wrote:
> Apple has finally canned [1] the ZFS port [2]. To try and keep momentum up
> and continue to use the best filing system available, a group of fans have
> set up a continuation project and mailing list [3,4].
The article that was mentioned a few hours ago did mention
licen
Apple has finally canned [1] the ZFS port [2]. To try and keep momentum up and
continue to use the best filing system available, a group of fans have set up a
continuation project and mailing list [3,4].
If anyone's interested in joining in to help, please join in the mailing list.
[1] http://a
