On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > I bet you think it'd be nice if we had a public equivalent of
> > _getgroupsbymember()...
>
> Indeed, that would be useful in numerous contexts. It would be even nicer
> if the approp
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:36:38AM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
> > I bet you think it'd be nice if we had a public equivalent of
> > _getgroupsbymember()...
>
> Indeed, that would be useful in numerous contexts. It would be even nicer
> if the app
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> I bet you think it'd be nice if we had a public equivalent of
> _getgroupsbymember()...
Indeed, that would be useful in numerous contexts. It would be even nicer
if the appropriate standards body added it alongside of the current
getgr* functions to
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 06:35:49PM -0700, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I'd appreciate any feedback, particularly about things that don't work
> right :).
I bet you think it'd be nice if we had a public equivalent of
_getgroupsbymember()...
Even better if we just had utility functions to do ACL evaluat
We are currently working on a Solaris/ZFS based central file system to
replace the DCE/DFS-based implementation we have had in place for over 10
years. One of the features of our previous implementation was that access
to files regardless of method (CIFS, AFP, HTTP, FTP, etc) was completely
contro
