Ross, Gary (G.A.) wrote:
What if something like the old CacheFS was revived, using ZFS as the
base file system instead of UFS? Using the ZFS filesystems on servers as
the "master" systems, the laptop builds a "cache" of files, used in the
last month or so.
If we ignore the "merging" problem for
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:11:13AM -0800, Ed Gould wrote:
>
> Disconnected operation is a hard problem. One of the better research
> efforts in that area was CODA, at CMU. CODA was, as I recall, and
> extension to AFS, but it's probably reasonable to take some of those
> ideas and marry them
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:57, Ross, Gary (G.A.) wrote:
...
What if something like the old CacheFS was revived, using ZFS as the
base file system instead of UFS?
...
Could this be a good thing, or am I way off base???
Disconnected operation is a hard problem. One of the better research
efforts
Here's something I've been noodling around for a while. I'd like to run
this by some of you in this forum and see what you think. If I'm off
topic, I apologize.
ZFS gives large companies the ability to have huge amounts of data
available to the desktop user. Moving the user data from a locally
ins
