Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

ginal Message - From: "Richard Elling" To: "Tim" Cc: Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 5:28 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... > Tim wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jonny Gerold > <mailto:j...@thermeon.com>> wrote:

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

From: "Wes Morgan" To: "Bob Friesenhahn" Cc: Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 5:48 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Matt Harrison wrote: >>> >>> Is

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Bob Friesenhahn wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Matt Harrison wrote: >> >> Is this guy seriously for real? It's getting hard to stay on the list >> with all this going on. No list etiquette, complete irrelevant >> ramblings, need I go on? > > The ZFS discussion list has produced

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

Tim wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jonny Gerold > wrote: > > Meh this is retarted. It looks like zpool list shows an incorrect > calculation? Can anyone agree that this looks like a bug? > > r...@fsk-backup:~# df -h | grep ambry > ambry

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

That's what I figured. That raidz & raidz1 are the same thing. The one is just put there to collect confusion ;) Thanks, Jonny Tim wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Jonny Gerold > wrote: > > BTW, is there any difference between raidz & raidz1 (is the o

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Jonny Gerold wrote: > BTW, is there any difference between raidz & raidz1 (is the one for one > disk parity) or does raidz have a parity disk too? > > Thanks, Jonny > It depends on who you're talking to I suppose. I would expect generally "raidz" is describing

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

BTW, is there any difference between raidz & raidz1 (is the one for one disk parity) or does raidz have a parity disk too? Thanks, Jonny Tim wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jonny Gerold > wrote: > > Meh this is retarted. It looks like zpool list show

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Jonny Gerold wrote: > Meh this is retarted. It looks like zpool list shows an incorrect > calculation? Can anyone agree that this looks like a bug? > > r...@fsk-backup:~# df -h | grep ambry > ambry 2.7T 27K 2.7T 1% /ambry > > r...@fsk-backup:

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

Jonny Gerold wrote: > Meh this is retarted. It looks like zpool list shows an incorrect > calculation? Can anyone agree that this looks like a bug? > > r...@fsk-backup:~# df -h | grep ambry > ambry 2.7T 27K 2.7T 1% /ambry > > r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool list > NAMESIZE US

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

Meh this is retarted. It looks like zpool list shows an incorrect calculation? Can anyone agree that this looks like a bug? r...@fsk-backup:~# df -h | grep ambry ambry 2.7T 27K 2.7T 1% /ambry r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool list NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT am

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Bob Friesenhahn < bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Matt Harrison wrote: > > > > Is this guy seriously for real? It's getting hard to stay on the list > > with all this going on. No list etiquette, complete irrelevant > > ramblings, need I

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

> JZ wrote: [...] > Is this guy seriously for real? It's getting hard to stay on the list > with all this going on. No list etiquette, complete irrelevant > ramblings, need I go on? He probably has nothing better to do. Just ignore him; that's what they dislike most. He will go away eventually.

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Matt Harrison wrote: > > Is this guy seriously for real? It's getting hard to stay on the list > with all this going on. No list etiquette, complete irrelevant > ramblings, need I go on? The ZFS discussion list has produced its first candidate for the rubber room that I menti

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

This seems to have worked. But is showing an abnormal amount of data. r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool list NAMESIZE USED AVAILCAP HEALTH ALTROOT ambry 3.62T 132K 3.62T 0% ONLINE - r...@fsk-backup:~# df -h | grep ambry ambry 2.7T 27K 2.7T 1% /ambry This happen

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

.] > > best, > z > > - Original Message - > From: "Jonny Gerold" > To: "JZ" > Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:19 PM > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... > > > Sorry that I broke your pride (all knowing) bu

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

Thank you! ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Jonny Gerold wrote: > Hello, > I was hoping that this would work: > http://blogs.sun.com/zhangfan/entry/how_to_turn_a_mirror > > I have 4x(1TB) disks, one of which is filled with 800GB of data (that I > cant delete/backup somewhere else) > >> r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool create -f

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

ill not be open. Please, open folks, are you going to help Jonny or what? Best, z - Original Message - From: "JZ" To: "James C. McPherson" Cc: Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:42 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... > Hi James, > I h

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

that may not be open? best, z - Original Message - From: "James C. McPherson" To: "JZ" Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:35 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... > > Hello JZ, > I fail to see what your email has to do with

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

ent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:19 PM Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... Sorry that I broke your pride (all knowing) bubble by "challenging" you. But your just as stupid as I am since you did not give me a "solution." Find a solution, and I will rock with y

Re: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

the URL. That is the name I honor with Zhou. For that, if you need help, just let me know.] Best, 张寒星 - Original Message - From: "Jonny Gerold" To: Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 5:20 PM Subject: [zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks... > Hello, > I was hoping

[zfs-discuss] 4 disk raidz1 with 3 disks...

Hello, I was hoping that this would work: http://blogs.sun.com/zhangfan/entry/how_to_turn_a_mirror I have 4x(1TB) disks, one of which is filled with 800GB of data (that I cant delete/backup somewhere else) > r...@fsk-backup:~# zpool create -f ambry raidz1 c4t0d0 c5t0d0 c5t1d0 > /dev/lofi/1 > r.