Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread David W. Smith
Gary, Thanks for the information these kernel type of patches. David On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:33 -0600, Gary Mills wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0800, David W. Smith wrote: > > > > Also, has anyone had problems installing 118855-36 with smpatch? I had > > issues, and ended up ha

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Gary Mills
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:20:49AM -0800, David W. Smith wrote: > > Also, has anyone had problems installing 118855-36 with smpatch? I had > issues, and ended up having to install it with patchadd. Apparently, this patch, and probably all future kernel patches, can't be applied with smpatch. Th

Re: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Enda O'Connor
Hi 118855-36 is marked interactive and is not installable by automation, or at least should not be installed by smpatch. If you look in the patchpro.download.directory from "smpatch get" under the dir cache ( if I remember correctly ) you will see a current.zip ( possibly with a time stamp a

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread David W. Smith
I'm pretty sure I have a service plan, but smpatch is not returning me the 124205 patch. I'm currently running Solaris 10, update 2. Also, has anyone had problems installing 118855-36 with smpatch? I had issues, and ended up having to install it with patchadd. David On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 08:5

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Joe Little
On 2/5/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Casper, Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:32:49 PM, you wrote: >>Hello zfs-discuss, >> >> I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id >> should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. >> >> However desp

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Dennis Clarke
/* Warning : soapbox speech ahead */ > > Something here is broken. > As a rule don't trust smpatch. Don't trust the freeware pca either. Either one may or may not include patches that you don't need or they may list patches you do need or seem to need but once you apply them you find your s

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Casper, Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:41:28 PM, you wrote: >>Looks like 124205-04 is needed. >>While I can see it on SunSolve smpatch doesn't show it. >> >>Also many ZFS bugs listed in 124205-04 are also listed in 118855-36 while >>it looks like only 124205-04 is actually covering them and p

Re: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Enda O'Connor
Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Casper, Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:32:49 PM, you wrote: Hello zfs-discuss, I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. However despite -36 is installed 'zpool upgrade' still

Re: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Enda O'Connor
Robert Milkowski wrote: Hello Robert, Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:26:57 PM, you wrote: RM> Hello zfs-discuss, RM> I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id RM> should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. RM> However despite -36 is installed 'zpool

Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Casper, Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:32:49 PM, you wrote: >>Hello zfs-discuss, >> >> I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id >> should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. >> >> However despite -36 is installed 'zpool upgrade' still claims only >>

Re: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Casper . Dik
>Looks like 124205-04 is needed. >While I can see it on SunSolve smpatch doesn't show it. > >Also many ZFS bugs listed in 124205-04 are also listed in 118855-36 while >it looks like only 124205-04 is actually covering them and provides >necessary binaries. > >Something is messed up with -36. Som

Re: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Robert, Monday, February 5, 2007, 2:26:57 PM, you wrote: RM> Hello zfs-discuss, RM> I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id RM> should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. RM> However despite -36 is installed 'zpool upgrade' still claims onl

Re: [zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Casper . Dik
>Hello zfs-discuss, > > I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id > should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. > > However despite -36 is installed 'zpool upgrade' still claims only > v1 and v2 support. Alse there's no zfs promote, etc. > > /kernel/drv

[zfs-discuss] 118855-36 & ZFS

2007-02-05 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello zfs-discuss, I've patched U2 system to 118855-36. Several zfs related bugs id should be covered between -19 and -36 like HotSpare support. However despite -36 is installed 'zpool upgrade' still claims only v1 and v2 support. Alse there's no zfs promote, etc. /kernel/drv/zfs is da