Re: [zfs-discuss] [xen-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-29 Thread Kevin Fox
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:38 AM, K wrote: > > 1/ Anchor vNic, the equivalent of linux dummy interfaces, we need more > flexibility in the way we setup xen networking. What is sad is that > the code is already available in the unreleased crossbow bits... but > it won't appear in nevada until Q1 2008 :

Re: [zfs-discuss] [xen-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-29 Thread Martin
Regarding the following that I also hit, see http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=180995 and if any further details or tests are required, I would be happy to assist. > 3/ Problem with DMA under Xen ... e.g. my areca raid cards works > perfect on a 8GB box without xen but because

Re: [zfs-discuss] [xen-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-28 Thread James C. McPherson
Mark Johnson wrote: > K wrote: ... >> 3/ Problem with DMA under Xen ... e.g. my areca raid cards works >> perfect on a 8GB box without xen but because of the way xen allocates >> memory... I am forced to allocate only 1 or 2 gig for the dom0 or the >> areca drivers will fail miserably trying

Re: [zfs-discuss] [xen-discuss] xVm blockers!

2007-11-28 Thread Mark Johnson
K wrote: > 1/ Anchor vNic, the equivalent of linux dummy interfaces, we need more > flexibility in the way we setup xen networking. What is sad is that > the code is already available in the unreleased crossbow bits... but > it won't appear in nevada until Q1 2008 :( > > This is a real blo