James Lever wrote:
Nathan Hudson-Crim,
On 04/08/2009, at 8:02 AM, Nathan Hudson-Crim wrote:
Andre, I've seen this before. What you have to do is ask James each
question 3 times and on the third time he will tell the truth. ;)
fwiw.. I totally could see this in a joking context.. I won't tell
Nathan Hudson-Crim,
On 04/08/2009, at 8:02 AM, Nathan Hudson-Crim wrote:
Andre, I've seen this before. What you have to do is ask James each
question 3 times and on the third time he will tell the truth. ;)
I know this is probably meant to be seen as a joke, but it's clearly
in very poor t
I was absolutely not impugning you in any way but rather trying to lighten the
mood with a little Austin Powers humor. I'll refrain from this in the future.
And quite to the contrary of any negative feelings, I am pleased and grateful
that you are participating in this conversation.
Regards,
Na
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
Nathan Hudson-Crim wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
> > Andre Lue wrote:
> >
> > Was de-duplication slated for snv_119?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > > If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and in which
> > form will we
> > > see it (synchronou
> On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
> Andre Lue wrote:
>
> Was de-duplication slated for snv_119?
>
> No.
>
> > If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and in which
> form will we
> > see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
>
> No, and no.
>
> Sorry,
> James
Andre, I've seen this before
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
Andre Lue wrote:
Was de-duplication slated for snv_119?
No.
> If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and in which form will we
> see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
No, and no.
Sorry,
James
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystem
Was de-duplication slated for snv_119? If not can anyone say which snv_xxx and
in which form will we see it (synchronous, asynchronous both)?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mai
