2012-02-16 14:57, Olaf Seibert wrote:
On Wed 15 Feb 2012 at 14:49:14 +0100, Olaf Seibert wrote:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
tank FAULTED 0 0 2
raidz2-0 DEGRADED 0 0 8
da0
On Wed 15 Feb 2012 at 14:49:14 +0100, Olaf Seibert wrote:
> NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
> tank FAULTED 0 0 2
> raidz2-0 DEGRADED 0 0 8
> da0 ONLINE 0 0
On 02/15/2012 04:02 PM, Paul Kraus wrote:
Are you saying that you cannot replace a failed drive without
shutting down the system? If that is the case with FreeBSD then I
suggest that FreeBSD is not ready for production use. I know that
under Solaris you_can_ replace failed drives with no do
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Tiemen Ruiten wrote:
> The correct sequence to replace a failed drive in a ZFS pool is:
>
> zpool offline tank da4
> shutdown and replace the drive
> zpool replace tank da4
Are you saying that you cannot replace a failed drive without
shutting down the system
On 02/15/2012 02:49 PM, Olaf Seibert wrote:
This is the current status:
$ zpool status
pool: tank
state: FAULTED
status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient
replicas for the pool to continue functioning.
action: Attach the missing device and online it u
At the moment I am feverishly seeking advice for how to fix a broken ZFS
raidz2 I have (using FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE).
This is the current status:
$ zpool status
pool: tank
state: FAULTED
status: One or more devices could not be opened. There are insufficient
replicas for the pool to cont
