On 8/2/2011 7:07 AM, Gordon Ross wrote:
It seems consistent to me that a "discard" mode would simply never
present suid/sgid/sticky. (It discards mode settings.) After all,
the suid/sgid/sticky bits don't have any counterpart in Windows
security descriptors, and Windows ACL use interited $CREAT
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> On 7/19/2011 7:10 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
>
>> The idea: A new "aclmode" setting called "discard", meaning that
>> the users don't care at all about the traditional mode bits. A
>> dataset with aclmode=discard would have the chmod system ca
On 7/19/2011 7:10 PM, Gordon Ross wrote:
The idea: A new "aclmode" setting called "discard", meaning that
the users don't care at all about the traditional mode bits. A
dataset with aclmode=discard would have the chmod system call and NFS
setattr do absolutely nothing to the mode bits.
The c
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Now that illumos has restored the aclmode option to zfs, I would like to
> revisit the topic of potentially expanding the suite of available modes.
[...]
At one point, I was experimenting with some code for smbfs that would
"invent" the mod
