Jens Elkner wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:35:47AM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
The reason why the (implicit) truncation could be taking long might be due
to
6723423 [6]UFS slow following large file deletion with fix for 6513858
installed
To overcome this problem fo
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:35:47AM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
>The reason why the (implicit) truncation could be taking long might be due
>to
>6723423 [6]UFS slow following large file deletion with fix for 6513858
>installed
>
>To overcome this problem for S10, the offe
Jens Elkner wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:01:39PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:44:21PM -0500, Al Hopper wrote:
This behavior is common to tmpfs, UFS and I tested it on early ZFS
releases. I have no idea why - I have not made the time to figure it
out. Wh
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:01:39PM +0530, Pramod Batni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:44:21PM -0500, Al Hopper wrote:
> >
> > This behavior is common to tmpfs, UFS and I tested it on early ZFS
> > releases. I have no idea why - I have not made the time to figure it
> > out. What I have ob
Original Message
Subject:Re: [zfs-discuss] ZSF Solaris
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 07:21:56 +0200
From: Jens Elkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
