Re: [ufs-discuss] Re: [zfs-discuss] Differences between ZFS and UFS.

2007-01-02 Thread Frank Batschulat (Home)
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:13:04 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think removing the ability to use link(2) or unlink(2) on directories would hurt no-one and would make a few things easier. I'd be rather carful here, see the standards implications drafted in 4917742. The standard gives perm

Re: [ufs-discuss] Re: [zfs-discuss] Differences between ZFS and UFS.

2006-12-30 Thread Casper . Dik
>> I think removing the ability to use link(2) or unlink(2) on directories >> would hurt no-one and would make a few things easier. > >I'd be rather carful here, see the standards implications drafted in >4917742. The standard gives permission to disallow unlink() on directories: "The path

Re: [ufs-discuss] Re: [zfs-discuss] Differences between ZFS and UFS.

2006-12-30 Thread Frank Batschulat (Home)
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:50:53 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Link with the target being a directory and the source a any file or only directories? And only as superuer? I'm sorry, I ment unlink(2) here. Ah, so symmetrical with link(2) to directories. unlink(2) doesn't always work and r