On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:13:04 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think removing the ability to use link(2) or unlink(2) on directories
would hurt no-one and would make a few things easier.
I'd be rather carful here, see the standards implications drafted in
4917742.
The standard gives perm
>> I think removing the ability to use link(2) or unlink(2) on directories
>> would hurt no-one and would make a few things easier.
>
>I'd be rather carful here, see the standards implications drafted in
>4917742.
The standard gives permission to disallow unlink() on directories:
"The path
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:50:53 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Link with the target being a directory and the source a any file or
only directories? And only as superuer?
I'm sorry, I ment unlink(2) here.
Ah, so symmetrical with link(2) to directories.
unlink(2) doesn't always work and r