Re: [zfs-discuss] Who is using ZFS ACL's in production?

2010-03-02 Thread ep
On 2 March 2010 10:35, Fredrich Maney wrote: > Logically it would be setuid + setgid + sticky, but it is not defined > in the man page and I don't have the ability to read through the > applicable source code. If it's not available, then I retract my > suggestion, and instead suggest that the man

Re: [zfs-discuss] Who is using ZFS ACL's in production?

2010-03-02 Thread ep
On 2 March 2010 08:13, Fredrich Maney wrote: > I haven't been really closely following this discussion, but I might > have a solution. > > A quick glance at 'man chmod(1)' will show that there is an unused bit > in the file mask, namely '7000'. Isn't that just like having setuid + setgid + sticky