My Supermicro H8DA3-2's onboard 1068E SAS chip isn't recognized in OpenSolaris,
and I'd like to keep this particular system "all Supermicro," so the L8i it is.
I know there have been issues with Supermicro-branded 1068E controllers, so
just wanted to verify that the stock mpt driver supports it.
thank you. this is exactly what I was looking for.
This is for remote replication so it looks like I am out of luck.
bummer.
Asa
On Apr 14, 2008, at 4:09 PM, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> Not at present, but it's a good RFE. Unfortunately it won't be
> quite as simple as just ad
/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
someCheckSumVodooFunc(tank/myfs)
someCheckSumVodooFunc(tank/myfs_BACKUP)
is there some zdb hackery which results in a metadata checksum usable
in this scenario?
Thank you all!
Asa
zfs worshiper
Berkeley, CA
___
zfs-discuss mailing
on opensolaris.org for the text of some of
the errors I know about, with no luck. Are these scattered about or
is there some errors.c file I don't know about?
Thanks in advance.
Asa
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
way(mostly =)), I now need to
solve the nfs side of things so that at the point of failing over.
I have isolated zfs out of the equation, I receive the same stale file
handle errors if I try and share an arbitrary UFS folder to the client
through the cluster interface.
Yeah I am a hack.
Asa
, slower, larger failover server only to be
used during downtime on the main server.)
Worst case scenario here seems to be that I would have to forcibly
unmount and remount all my client mounts.
Ill start bugging the nfs-discuss people.
Thank you.
Asa
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Darren J Moffat
On Nov 10, 2007, at 3:49 PM, Mattias Pantzare wrote:
> 2007/11/10, asa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello all. I am working on an NFS failover scenario between two
>> servers. I am getting the stale file handle errors on my (linux)
>> client which point to there being a m
arounds to this issue?
Thank you kind sirs and ladies.
Asa
-hack
On Nov 10, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
> Hey Bill:
>
> what's an object here? or do we have a mapping between "objects" and
> block pointers?
>
> for example a zdb -bb might show:
&g
)
love, but those would involve whole tree crawls(kind of slow on a
multi Tb filesystem).
Possible?
Asa
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
r/foosmall
zfs rename tank/bar/foosmall tank/foo
kinda clunky and you have to have twice as much space available and
there are probably other issues with it as I am not a pro zfs user
here but, worked for me =)
Asa
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-di
zfs user
here but, worked for me =)
Asa
On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:32 AM, Carson Gaspar wrote:
> roland wrote:
>
>> is there a reliable method of re-compressing a whole zfs volume
>> after turning on compression or changing compression scheme ?
>
> It would be slow, and the f
11 matches
Mail list logo
