On Aug 20, 2008, at 6:39 PM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
> John wrote:
>> Our "enterprise" is about 300TB.. maybe a bit more...
>>
>> You are correct that most of the time we grow and not shrink...
>> however, we are fairly dynamic and occasionally do shrink. DBA's
>> have been known to be off on the
The issues with CIFS is not just complexity; it's the total amount
of incompatible change in the kernel that we had to make in order
to make the CIFS protocol a first class citizen in Solaris. This
includes changes in the VFS layer which would break all S10 file
systems. So in a very real sense C
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Zlotnick Fred
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> The in-kernel CIFS stack is not in Solaris 10 Update 5,
>>> and will never appear in any Solaris 10 update, because
>>&
d with Symantec to inform them of the
changes they have to make to ensure that Veritas file systems
work with the new VFS layer going forward.)
-- Fred
On Apr 18, 2008, at 7:26 AM, Tim wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Zlotnick Fred
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
The in-kernel CIFS stack is not in Solaris 10 Update 5,
and will never appear in any Solaris 10 update, because
the kernel changes required are too invasive. You need
OpenSolaris.
-- Fred
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Mertol Ozyoney wrote:
> Hi ;
>
> Cant remember on top of my head. Do solaris l
