Dear All,
I will try to post DTool source code asap
DTool is depend on our patented middleware, need one or two days to
clarify :-P
Very Sorry.
Bob,
I have tried your pdf but did not get good latency numbers even after
array tuning...
cheers
tharindu
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Sat
Deal All,
Thank you very much for the continuous support
Sorry for the late reply ...
I was trying to allocate 2540 & 2 x 4600 for try out your
recommendation ...
Finally, I could reserve 2540 disk array for testing purpose.
so I am free to try out each and every points you have emphasi
trading
system) ...
cheers
tharindu
Richard Elling wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Tharindu Rukshan
Bamunuarachchi wrote:
10,000 x 700 = 7MB per second ..
We have this rate for whole day
10,000 orders per second is
Sun providing SSD arrays ??
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wed Jul 23 11:22:51 2008
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] [zfs-code] Peak every 4-5 second
We do not use raidz*.
Virtually, no raid or stripe through OS.
We have 4 disk RAID1 volumes. RAID1 was created from CAM on 2540.
2540 does not have RAID 1+0 or 0+1.
cheers
tharindu
Brandon High wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi
<[EMAIL PROTEC
> txt_time/D
mdb: failed to dereference symbol: unknown symbol name
> txg_time/D
mdb: failed to dereference symbol: unknown symbol name
Am I doing something wrong
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Tharindu,
Wednesday, July 23, 2008, 6:35:33 AM, you wrote:
TRB> Dear Mark/All,
TRB> Our
10,000 x 700 = 7MB per
second ..
We have this rate for whole day
10,000 orders per second is minimum requirments of modern day stock
exchanges ...
Cache still help us for ~1 hours, but after that who will help us ...
We are using 2540 for current testing ...
I have tried same with
al, this is a bad idea, as there is somewhat of a
> "fixed overhead" associated with each sync, so increasing the sync
> frequency could result in increased IO.
>
> -Mark
>
> Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi wrote:
>> Dear ZFS Gurus,
>>
>> We are deve