Re: [zfs-discuss] Yager on ZFS

2007-12-05 Thread Stefano Spinucci
, please don't use further my name for your guessing of an hidden plot to discover the (evident) bias of your messages. thanks --- Stefano Spinucci This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] Yager on ZFS

2007-12-05 Thread Stefano Spinucci
> e would reply "NONE" at your question "what level > of risk user is willing to > > tolerate". > > NONE is not possible. It is a question of how much > risk you > are willing to tolerate for what cost. Thankfully, > these > days you have a va

Re: [zfs-discuss] Yager on ZFS

2007-12-05 Thread Stefano Spinucci
, some to be versioned, some to be unversioned. I can't afford silent data corruption and, if the final response is "*now* there is no *real* opensource software alternative to zfs automatic checksumming and simple snapshotting" I'll be an happy solaris user (for data storage)

Re: [zfs-discuss] Yager on ZFS

2007-12-04 Thread Stefano Spinucci
x end user, I'm aware only of Oracle btrfs (http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/), who is a Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem not in a final state. what *real* alternatives are you referring to??? if I missed something tell me, and I'll happily stay with linux with my data check