Erm, yeah, sorry about that (previous stupid questions). I wrote it before
having my first cup of coffee... Thanks for the details, though. If you guys
have any updates, please, drop a link to new info in this thread (I'll do the
same if I find out anything more), as I have it on my watch lis
> eric kustarz wrote:
> > On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >> You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar!
> Seriously, this is exactly
> > the information I was looking for, thank you very
> much!
> >>
> >>
Thank you very much, this answers all my questions! Much appreciated!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
You sir, are a gentleman and a scholar! Seriously, this is exactly the
information I was looking for, thank you very much!
Would you happen to know if this has improved since build 63 or if chipset has
any effect one way or the other?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Thank you for your quick responses! I was unable to get back to this thread on
account of being stuck on a motorcycle yesterday (still can't feel my legs!).
I think the KISS principle applies to 95% of computing (keeping in mind that
90% of everything is crap ;)). I've read Relling's blogs wi
First Post!
Sorry, I had to get that out of the way to break the ice...
I was wondering if it makes sense to zone ZFS pools by disk slice, and if it
makes a difference with RAIDZ. As I'm sure we're all aware, the end of a drive
is half as fast as the beginning ([i]where the zoning stipulates th
