Re: [zfs-discuss] aclmode gone in S10u10?

2011-09-15 Thread Sami Ketola
On Sep 14, 2011, at 12:22 , Ian Collins wrote: > On 09/14/11 08:49 PM, Sami Ketola wrote: >> On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote: >>>> I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list com

Re: [zfs-discuss] aclmode gone in S10u10?

2011-09-14 Thread Sami Ketola
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:21 , Peter Tribble wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 1:50 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote: >> I recently saw a message posted to the sunmanagers list complaining >> about installing a kernel patch and suddenly having his ACL's disappear >> completely whenever a chmod occurred. I re

Re: [zfs-discuss] Zpool with data errors

2011-06-21 Thread Sami Ketola
On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Todd Urie wrote: > The volumes sit on HDS SAN. The only reason for the volumes is to prevent > inadvertent import of the zpool on two nodes of a cluster simultaneously. > Since we're on SAN with Raid internally, didn't seem to we would need zfs to > provide that

Re: [zfs-discuss] How to avoid striping ?

2010-10-19 Thread Sami Ketola
On 18 Oct 2010, at 17:44, Habony, Zsolt wrote: > Thank You all for the comments. > > You should imagine a datacenter with > - standards not completely depending on me. > - SAN for many OSs, one of them is Solaris, (and not the major amount) So you get luns from the storage team and there is no

Re: [zfs-discuss] Opensolaris is apparently dead

2010-08-17 Thread Sami Ketola
On 16 Aug 2010, at 23:11, Andrej Podzimek wrote: > > My only point was: There is no published report saying that stability or > *performance* of Btrfs will be worse (or better) than that of ZFS. This is > because nobody can guess how Btrfs will perform once it's finished. (In fact > nobody eve

Re: [zfs-discuss] Apple Removes Nearly All Reference To ZFS

2009-06-11 Thread Sami Ketola
On 11 Jun 2009, at 12:44, Paul van der Zwan wrote: Strange thing I noticed in the keynote is that they claim the disk usage of Snow Leopard is 6 GB less than Leopard mostly because of compression. Either they have implemented compressed binaries or they use filesystem compression. Neither

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recover ZFS pool

2008-11-12 Thread Sami Ketola
On 13 Nov 2008, at 00:20, Simon Gao wrote: > I am having problem with one ZFS pool and the raid controller was > moved around. The OS is Solaris 10 8/07 X86. > > All the drives are found by the OS, but ZFS can't find two hot spare > drives for some reason. And the pool is unavailable. Here

Re: [zfs-discuss] 10u6 any patches yet?

2008-11-12 Thread Sami Ketola
On 12 Nov 2008, at 20:15, Vincent Fox wrote: > Just wondering if anyone knows of a patch released for 10u6? Yes. Many patches has been released since u6 was frozen. Sami ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Backup of ZFS Filesystem with ACL 4

2007-03-26 Thread Sami Ketola
Ayaz Anjum wrote: Hi ! I have currently an NFS server over ufs above 5 TB with alot of ACL which i was planning to migrate to zfs. But since backup of zfs with ACL is not possible, i am very upset for not being able to go ahead with replacing ufs with zfs. Backing up ZFS ACL:s is supported o