Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS development moving behind closed doors

2010-08-17 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 9:13 AM, David Magda wrote: > On Aug 14, 2010, at 19:39, Kevin Walker wrote: > >> I once watched a video interview with Larry from Oracle, this ass rambled >> on >> about how he hates cloud computing and that everyone was getting into >> cloud >> computing and in his opinio

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS on Ubuntu

2010-06-25 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Erik Trimble wrote: > (2) Ubuntu is a desktop distribution. Don't be fooled by their "server" > version. It's not - it has too many idiosyncrasies and bad design choices to > be a stable server OS.  Use something like Debian, SLES, or RHEL/CentOS. Why would you sa

Re: [zfs-discuss] Native ZFS for Linux

2010-06-10 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Anurag Agarwal wrote: > We at KQInfotech, initially started on an independent port of ZFS to linux. > When we posted our progress about port last year, then we came to know about > the work on LLNL port. Since then we started working on to re-base our > changing on

[zfs-discuss] Snapshot question

2009-11-13 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
While reading about NILFS here: http://www.linux-mag.com/cache/7345/1.html I saw this: *One of the most noticeable features of NILFS is that it can "continuously > and automatically save instantaneous states of the file system without > interrupting service". NILFS refers to these as checkpoint

[zfs-discuss] Apple Removes Nearly All Reference To ZFS

2009-06-10 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/06/09/2336223/Apple-Removes-Nearly-All-Reference-To-ZFS ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS, difference in reported available space?

2009-06-07 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
Tim, Nevermind. I should have Read The Fine Manual (tm) from the start. Says zpool(1M): --- (...) zpool list (...) (...) This command reports actual physical space available to the storage pool. The physical space can be different fr

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS, difference in reported available space?

2009-06-07 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Tim wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Rodrigo E. De León Plicet > wrote: >> >> Related to the attached file, I just want to understand why, if 'zpool >> list' reports 191MB available for coolpool, 'df -h|gr

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS rollback, ORA-00322: log 1 of thread 1 is not current copy (???)

2009-05-31 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
Nevermind, found the reason. Linux caching was messing with things. Workaround: http://linux-mm.org/Drop_Caches Regards. ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

[zfs-discuss] ZFS, difference in reported available space?

2009-05-31 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
Hi. Just to report the following. Thanks for your time. Regards. Forwarded conversation Subject: Difference in reported available space? From: Rodrigo E. De León Plicet Date: Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM To: zfs-f

[zfs-discuss] ZFS rollback, ORA-00322: log 1 of thread 1 is not current copy (???)

2009-05-31 Thread Rodrigo E . De León Plicet
Hi. Using ZFS-FUSE. $SUBJECT happened 3 out of 5 times while testing, just wanna know if someone has seen such scenario before. Steps: r...@localhost:/# uname -a Linux localhost 2.6.24-24-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 15:54:25 UTC 2009 i