On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Joerg Schilling
wrote:
> The license combination used by cdrtools was verified by several lawywers
> including Sun Legal and Eben Moglen and no lawyer did find a problem.
[citation needed]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news-team/2009-February/000413.ht
Hi world,
I have a 10-disk RAID-Z2 system with 4 GB of DDR2 RAM and a 3 GHz Core 2 Duo.
It's exporting ~280 filesystems over NFS to about half a dozen machines.
Under some loads (in particular, any attempts to rsync between another
machine and this one over SSH), the machine's load average someti
Hail, caesar.
I've got a 10-disk RAID-Z2 backed by the 1.5 TB Seagate drives
everyone's so fond of. They've all received a firmware upgrade (the
sane one, not the one that caused your drives to brick if the internal
event log hit the wrong number on boot).
They're attached to an ARC-1280ML, a reas
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Andre van Eyssen wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Rince wrote:
>
> FWIW, I strongly expect live ripping of a SATA device to not panic the
>> disk
>> layer. It explicitly shouldn't panic the ZFS layer, as ZFS is supposed to
>> b
FWIW, I strongly expect live ripping of a SATA device to not panic the disk
layer. It explicitly shouldn't panic the ZFS layer, as ZFS is supposed to be
"fault-tolerant" and "drive dropping away at any time" is a rather expected
scenario.
[I've popped disks out live in many cases, both when I was
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> Florian Ermisch wrote:
>
>> Richard Elling schrieb:
>> [...]
>>
>>> ZFS maintains a cache of what pools were imported so that at boot time,
>>> it will automatically try to re-import the pool. The file is
>>> /etc/zfs/zpool.cache
>>> and yo
On 12/19/06, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:55:59PM -0500, Rince wrote:
>
> If it doesn't show up there, I'll be surprised.
I take that back, I just managed to restore my ability to boot the old
instance.
I will be making backups an
On 12/19/06, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my desktop at work. It used to have a 10G
partition with Windows on it and the rest of the disk was for
Solaris. Windows pissed me off one too many times and got turned
into a 10G swap partition.
Because of the way
So I have attached to my system two 7-disk SCSI arrays, each of 18.2 GB disks.Each of them is a RAID-Z1 zpool.I had a disk I thought was a dud, so I pulled the fifth disk in my array and put the dud in. Sure enough, Solaris started spitting errors like there was no tomorrow in dmesg, and wouldn't u
Hi all,I recently created a RAID-Z1 pool out of a set of 7 SCSI disks, using the following command:# zpool create magicant raidz c5t0d0 c5t1d0 c5t2d0 c5t3d0 c5t4d0 c5t5d0 c5t6d0It worked fine, but I was slightly confused by the size yield (99 GB vs the 116 GB I had on my other RAID-Z1 pool of same-
Recently, I was in a position where I was aiding someone in
configuring five disks in RAID-Z1, and we were discussing whether or
not it would be possible to add (not replace) disks to the pool
without destroying and recreating the filesystem.
As far as I know, this is not currently possible (as o
11 matches
Mail list logo
