I built in the normal fashion, with the CBE compilers
(cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-10 2009/04/30), and 12u1 lint.
I'm not subscribed to zfs-discuss, but have you established whether the
problematic build is DEBUG? (the bits I uploaded were non-DEBUG).
-- Rich
Haudy Kazemi wrote:
>>> C
Brent Jones writes:
>>
>> I haven't figured out a way to identify the problem, still trying to
>> find a 100% way to reproduce this problem.
>> Seemingly the more snapshots I send at a given time, the likelihood of
>> this happening goes up, but, correlation is not causation :)
>>
>> I might try
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:56:53PM -0700, Jim Walker wrote:
>> Version 1.8 of the ZFS test suite was released today on opensolaris.org.
>>
>> The ZFS test suite source tarballs, packages and baseline can be
>> downloaded at:
>> http://dlc.sun.com/
Jeff Victor wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Friday, December 15, 2006, 9:36:48 PM, you wrote:
JV> David Smith wrote:
We currently have a couple of servers at Solaris 10 U2, and we would
like
to get to Solaris 10 U3 for the new zfs features. Can this be
accomplished
via patching,
Patrick Petit wrote:
Hi,
Some additional elements. Irrespective of the SCSI error reported
earlier, I have established that Solaris dom0 hangs anyway when a domU
is booted from a disk image located on an emulated ZFS volume. Has this
been also observed by other members of the community? Is th
Frank Cusack wrote:
Patrick Bachmann:
Hey Bill,
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
Overly wide raidz groups seems to be an unfenced hole that people new to
ZFS fall into on a regular basis.
The man page warns against this but that doesn't seem to be sufficient.
Given that zfs has relatively few such tra
