[zfs-discuss] Interesting ACM Queue article - zfs implications?

2010-06-16 Thread Richard Bruce
performance hit that can take place when deleting large datasets from a de-duped pool). The ACM Queue article URL is below: http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1814327 Any thoughts? Thanks in advance. Richard Bruce -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] one more time: pool size changes

2010-06-03 Thread Richard Bruce
ing a raidz vdev, although that is my primary interest in it. The basics of expanding a raidz vdev once BP rewrite is done have already been outlined by Adam Leventhal. See the URL below. http://blogs.sun.com/ahl/entry/expand_o_matic_raid_z Richard Bruce -- This message posted from opensolaris.o

Re: [zfs-discuss] hard drive choice, TLER/ERC/CCTL

2009-12-10 Thread Richard Bruce
> Mark Grant wrote: > I don't think ZFS does any timing out. > It's up to the drivers underneath to timeout and send > an error back to > ZFS - only they know what's reasonable for a given > disk type and bus > type. I think that is the issue. By my reading, many (if not most) consumer drives

Re: [zfs-discuss] Expected ZFS behavior?

2009-12-08 Thread Richard Bruce
Bob, Thanks for your help. I thought that I might have seen something about this in the past but couldn't remember for sure. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. >From the URL below, it states that each TXG will be limited to 1/8th of the >physical memory (this differs from the 7/8

[zfs-discuss] Expected ZFS behavior?

2009-12-07 Thread Richard Bruce
pool. I completely removed this drive to RMA it. I'd be happy to provide any info needed. Thanks in advance. Richard Bruce -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opens