usable as a desktop :-)
Rainer
--
---------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ool2/ROOT/snv_134-pkg143
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Fire
V880 serving as fileserver for the GCC-on-Solaris project), so it would
be extremely valuable to get this fixed/worked around.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
---------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
s the internal disk in a laptop, so no device or controller change
should happen here and cause a rename from c1d0d0 to c11t0d0.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnolo
Rainer
--
---------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Mark J Musante writes:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> zpool status thinks rpool is on c1t0d0s3, while format (and the kernel)
>> correctly believe it's c11t0d0(s3) instead.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>
> Try removing the symlinks or using
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
---------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
did make a difference. This
very much looks like
6741948 ZFS pool root dataset sometimes fails to be mounted after "zpool import"
which was closed as not reproducible.
I've no idea how to avoid/fix this issue. Suggestions?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
-----
age pool, submitted in 2003!) is. I suppose this might be dealt with
by the vdev removal code, but overall it's scary that dealing with such
fundamental issues takes so long.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Facult
neral use.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ks.
Rainer
---------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
at an improved implementation would probably
mean an incompatible change (like doing away with the explicit bootblk
argument).
Unfortunately, I've too many other issues on my plate right now to attack
this one.
Rainer
----
nv_93 UFS BE I had still around, with the
exception that I used zpool import -f -R /mnt to avoid pathname clashes
between the miniroot and the imported pool. I think I even exported the
pool afterwards, but I'm no longer certain about this: I seem to remember
problems with exported root pools b
Rainer Orth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > instlalboot on the new disk and see if that fixes it.
>
> Unfortunately, it didn't. Reconsidering now, I see that I ran installboot
> against slice 0 (reduced by 1 sector as required by CR 6680633) instead of
> slice 2 (w
Mark J Musante writes:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to attach a second mirror to a ZFS root pool on an Ultra
> > 1/170E running snv_93.
> >
> > I've followed the workarounds for CR 6680633 and 6680633 from the ZFS
> >
afe archives after liveupgrade
(recently mentioned on install-discuss), I'd have been completely stuck.
Rainer
---------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
_
args:
Can't mount root
Fast Data Access MMU Miss
while the original side of the mirror works just fine.
Any advice on what could be wrong here?
Rainer
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology,
Rainer Orth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yesterday evening, I tried Live Upgrade on a Sun Fire V60x running SX:CE 90
> to SX:CE 93 with ZFS root (mirrored root pool called root). The LU itself
> ran without problems, but before rebooting the machine, I wanted to add
> some
=6121143629633742955
+guid=1526746004928780410
vdev_tree
type='mirror'
id=0
@@ -124,12 +124,12 @@
version=10
name='root'
state=0
-txg=14549625
+txg=14643900
pool_guid=14475053522795106129
hostid=336880771
-hos
m a SPARC
system running snv_57 to an x86 laptop with snv_42a?
6533369 panic in dnode_buf_byteswap importing zpool
Rainer
--
-
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
ios.
This has the additional advantage that with the advent of ZFS boot, you can
simply move / to a zfs file system and extend slice 0 to cover the whole
disk.
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bi
330 swap on zvol isn't added during boot
is missing. Any chance to get this in? Do I need an escalation for that,
or is it waiting to go in with ZFS boot in U4 only?
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of
Bill,
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:36, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > Perhaps lockstat(1M) should be updated to include something like
> > this in the EXAMPLES section.
>
> I filed 6452661 with this suggestion.
excellent, thanks.
> > Any word when this might be fixed?
>
lockstat are
identical.
Any word when this might be fixed?
Thanks.
Rainer
---------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discu
ine.
Rainer
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Before SXCR b43, you'll need the fix from CR 6405330 so the zvol is added
after a reboot. The fix hasn't been backported to S10 U2 (yet?), so it
is equally affected.
* A Live Upgrade comments the zvol entry in /etc/vfstab, so you (sort of)
loose swap after an upgrade ;-(
hink the ZFS Admin Guide mentions two
CRs for this, one for Legato and another for NetBackup.
Rainer
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-
Rainer
--
---------
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Constantin Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is this a known issue?
Yes, I've raised this during ZFS Beta as SDR-0192. For some reason, I
don't have a CR here.
Rainer
--
---------
Rain
Darren J Moffat writes:
> >>> You can avoid this by swapping to a zvol, though at the moment this
> >>> requires a fix for CR 6405330. Unfortunately, since one cannot yet dump
> >>> to
> >>> a zvol, one needs a dedicated dump device in this case ;-(
> >> Dedicated dump devices are *always* best,
e
layer between the dump code and the devices).
Rainer
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ough at the moment this
requires a fix for CR 6405330. Unfortunately, since one cannot yet dump to
a zvol, one needs a dedicated dump device in this case ;-(
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bi
servers to admin their zfs filesystems ;-(
Rainer
--
-----
Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
34 matches
Mail list logo
