heckpoints. Is
> this a concern ?
That's good news. No, the loss of initial performance isn't a big
problem - I'd be happy for it to go at spindle speed.
Regards,
--
Philip Beevers
Fidessa Infrastructure Development
mailt
of thing off. Of course, the ideal would be to have some
way of telling ZFS not to bother keeping pages in the ARC.
The latter appears to be bug 6429855. But the underlying behaviour
doesn't really seem desirable; are there plans afoot to do any work on
ZFS write throttling to address this kind
Roch Bourbonnais - Performance Engineering wrote:
Reported freemem will be lower when running with ZFS than
say UFS. The UFS page cache is considered as freemem. ZFS
will return it's 'cache' only when memory is needed. So you
will operate with lower freemem but won't actually suffer
fr
