Re: [zfs-discuss] Faulted SSDs

2010-12-20 Thread Paul Piscuc
h the same error name. On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Richard Elling wrote: > NexentaStor logs are in /var/log. But the real information of > interest is in the FMA ereports. fmdump -eV is your friend. > > -- richard > > On Dec 20, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Paul Piscuc > wrote: >

[zfs-discuss] Faulted SSDs

2010-12-20 Thread Paul Piscuc
Hi, The problem seems to be solved with a zpool clear. It is not clear what generated the issue, and I cannot locate what caused it, because a reboot seems to have deleted all logs:| . I have issued serveral grep's under /var/log, /var and now under /, but I could find any record. Also, I thought

[zfs-discuss] Faulted SSDs

2010-12-20 Thread Paul Piscuc
Hi, this is current setup that I have been doing tests on: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM zpool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t0d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c2t1d0 ONLINE 0 0 0

Re: [zfs-discuss] Recomandations

2010-11-29 Thread Paul Piscuc
6:03 AM, Erik Trimble wrote: > On 11/28/2010 1:51 PM, Paul Piscuc wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We are a company that want to replace our current storage layout with one >> that uses ZFS. We have been testing it for a month now, and everything looks >> promising. On

[zfs-discuss] Recomandations

2010-11-28 Thread Paul Piscuc
Hi, We are a company that want to replace our current storage layout with one that uses ZFS. We have been testing it for a month now, and everything looks promising. One element that we cannot determine is the optimum number of disks in a raid-z pool. In the ZFS best practice guide, 7,9 and 11 di