Stephen Stogner wrote:
> True we could have all the syslog data be directed towards the host but the
> underlying issue remains the same with the performance hit. We have used nfs
> shares for log hosts and mail hosts and we are looking towards using a zfs
> based mail store with nfs moutnts fr
Stephen Stogner wrote:
> Hello,
> We have a S10U5 server sharing with zfs sharing up NFS shares. While using
> the nfs mount for a log destination for syslog for 20 or so busy mail servers
> we have noticed that the throughput becomes severly degraded shortly. I have
> tried disabling the zi
Richard Elling wrote:
> I was able to reproduce this in b93, but might have a different
> interpretation of the conditions. More below...
>
> Ross Smith wrote:
>
>> A little more information today. I had a feeling that ZFS would
>> continue quite some time before giving an error, and today I'v
Let's stop feeding the troll...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Richard Elling
Sent: Thu 11/8/2007 11:45 PM
To: can you guess?
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Yager on ZFS
can you guess? wrote:
> CERN was using relatively cheap disks an
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> William Loewe
>
> I'm using a Sun Fire X4500 "Thumper" and trying to get some
> sense of the best performance I can get from it with zfs.
>
> I'm running without mirroring or raid, and have checksumming
> turned off. I built
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Garner
>
> So it is expected behavior on my Nexenta alpha 7 server for Sun's nfsd
> to stop responding after 2 hours of running a bittorrent client over
> nfs4 from a linux client, causing zfs snapshots to hang and requi
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike
> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:30 AM
>
> I would prefer something like 15+1 :) I want ZFS to be able to detect
> and correct errors, but I do not need to squeeze all the performance
> out of it (I'll be using it as a home
I would very much appreciate hearing from anyone that has experience running
large zfs pools on T2000s created out of vdevs provided as iscsi targets from
X4500s (Thumpers). Please respond with both positive or negative experiences,
either on or off list.
thanks in advance,
paul
__
Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> So assuming that you simply supply the zfs kernel module independently and
> CDDL licensed, there is little that the Linux kernel developers could do
> about it. Would never be part of the kernel distribution, but is that
> such a high price to pay for zfs on linux
Darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> What stands in ZFS's favour is that it has not been create _for_ Linux,
> rather that using the various header files is a way of _also_ making it
> available for Linux. Search the internet for discussions of the porting
> of AFS to Linux (I think it was AFS where
Sun is supposed to have work ongoing on clustered zfs, but is also supposed to
be out in the 2+ year timeframe.
I for one would love if someone involved in this work would give a little bit
of visibility into the effort and possibly how community members could help, if
one was sufficiently tale
> From: Eric Schrock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 12:05 PM
>
> The slow part of zpool import is actually discovering the
> pool configuration. This involves examining every device on
> the system (or every device within a 'import -d' directory)
> and seeing if i
Has anyone done benchmarking on the scalability and performance of zpool import
in terms of the number of devices in the pool on recent opensolaris builds?
In other words, what would the relative performance be for "zpool import" for
the following three pool configurations on multi-pathed 4G FC
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 3:38 PM
>
> Yes, I agree. I'm sorry I don't have the data that Jim presented at
> FAST, but he did present actual data. Richard Elling (I believe it
> was
> Richard) has also posted som
14 matches
Mail list logo