c4t12d0 AVAIL
One remark: I find the overview above a bit confusing ('spare'
apparently is 'DEGRADED' and consists of C4t2d0 and c4t11d0) but the
hotspare was properly activated this time and my pool is otherwise in
good health.
Thanks everyone for the replie
Hi Dan,
Dan Pritts wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:10:32AM +0100, Paul Boven wrote:
>> Any suggestions on how to further investigate / fix this would be very
>> much welcomed. I'm trying to determine whether this is a zfs bug or one
>> with the Transtec raidbox, and
:
>
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6343667
>
> i.e. scrub or resilver get's reset to 0% on a snapshot creation or deletion.
>Cheers.
I'm very sure of that: I've never done a snapshot on these, and I am the
only user on the machin
graded zpool - I hope to be able to test if b77 fares
any better with this.
Regards, Paul Boven.
--
Paul Boven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +31 (0)521-596547
Unix/Linux/Networking specialist
Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe - www.jive.nl
VLBI - It's a fringe science
_
s completely broken.
Any suggestions on how to further investigate / fix this would be very
much welcomed. I'm trying to determine whether this is a zfs bug or one
with the Transtec raidbox, and whether to file a bug with either
Transtec (Promise) or zfs.
Regards, Paul Boven.
--
Paul
Hi Dan,
Dan Pritts wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:25:24PM +0100, Paul Boven wrote:
>> We've building a storage system that should have about 2TB of storage
>> and good sequential write speed. The server side is a Sun X4200 running
>> Solaris 10u4 (plus yesterday
ts on how to proceed with this -
should I even be trying to use zfs in this situation?
Regards, Paul Boven.
--
Paul Boven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +31 (0)521-596547
Unix/Linux/Networking specialist
Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe - www.jive.nl
VLBI - It's a fringe science
___
n-way mirror, or on the raidz?
Regards, Paul Boven.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss