Eric Schrock wrote:
1. Some sort of background process to proactively find errors on disks
in use by ZFS. This will be accomplished by a background scrubbing
option, dependent on the block-rewriting work Matt and Mark are
working on. This will allow something like "zpool set scrub=2we
james hughes wrote:
This is intended as a defense in depth measure and also a sufficiently
good measure for the customers that don't need full compliance with
NIST like requirements that need degausing or physical destruction.
Govt, finance, healthcare all require the NIST overwrite...
Jim,
Eric Schrock wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 05:26:24PM -0600, Gregory Shaw wrote:
You're using hardware raid. The hardware raid controller will rebuild
the volume in the event of a single drive failure. You'd need to keep
on top of it, but that's a given in the case of either hardware or
softw
Neil,
I think it might be wise to look at this problem from the perspective
of an application (e.g. a simple database) designer taking into account
all the new things that Solaris ZFS provides.
In case of ZFS the designer does not have to worry about consistency
of the on-disk file system format
