I don't understand why you can't use 'zpool status'? That will show
the pools and the physical devices in each and is also a pretty basic
command. Examples are given in the sysadmin docs and manpages for
ZFS on the opensolaris ZFS community page.
I realize it's not quite the same command
Fixed. Thank you for the heads up on that.
Noel
On Sep 27, 2006, at 1:04 AM, Victor Latushkin wrote:
Hi All,
I've noticed that link to dmu_txg.c from the ZFS Source Code tour
is broken. It looks like it dmu_txg.c should be changed to dmu_tx.c
Please take care of this.
- Victor
___
I can also reproduce this on my test machines and have opened up CR
6475506 panic in dmu_recvbackup due to NULL pointer dereference
to track this problem. This is most likely due to recent changes
made in the snapshot code for -F. I'm looking into it...
thanks for testing!
Noel
On Sep 26, 2
Hey everybody,
I'd like to announce the addition of a "ZFS Links" page on the
Opensolaris ZFS community page. If you have any links to articles
that pertain to ZFS that you find useful or should be shared with the
community as a whole, please let us know and we'll add it to the page.
http
ZFS actually uses the ZAP to handle directory lookups. The ZAP is
not a btree but a specialized hash table where a hash for each
directory entry is generated based on that entry's name. Hence you
won't be doing any sort of linear search through the entire directory
for a file, a hash is g
I've filed a bug for the problem Tim mentions below.
6463140 zfs recv with a snapshot name that has 2 @@ in a row succeeds
This is most likely due to the order in which we call
zfs_validate_name in the zfs recv code, which would explain why other
snapshot commands like 'zfs snapshot' will fai
thanks for the heads up. I've fixed them to point to the right documents. NoelOn Aug 20, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Ricardo Correia wrote:By the way, the manpage links in http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/ are not correct, they are linked to wrong documents.
Your suspicions are correct, it's not possible to upgrade an
existing raidz pool to raidz2. You'll actually have to create the
raidz2 pool from scratch.
Noel
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Frank Cusack wrote:
Will it be possible to update an existing raidz to a raidz2? I
wouldn't
think s
We don't have a specific supported configuration method for usb
devices for ZFS. Most people are using them as mirrors or backups
for their laptop data. It's really up to you. There are a few
threads from the discuss archives where people have discussed some
different possible configs for
Hey Robert,
Well, not yet. Right now our top two priorities are improving
performance in multiple areas of zfs(soon there will be a performance
page tracking progess on the zfs community page), and also getting zfs
boot done. Hence, we're not currently working on heaps of brand new
features
a zpool remove/shrink type function is on our list of features we want
to add.
We have RFE
4852783 reduce pool capacity
open to track this.
Noel
Dick Davies wrote:
Just wondered if there'd been any progress in this area?
Correct me if i'm wrong, but as it stands, there's no way
to remove a d
Solaris 10u2 was released today. You can now download it from here:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
Noel
Joe Little wrote:
So, if I recall from this list, a mid-june release to the web was
expected for S10U2. I'm about to do some final production testing, and
I was wondering i
The links off the documentation page on the zfs open solaris site were
mysteriously pointing to the wrong subcommands on docs.sun.com. So if
you requested the man page for zfs, you actually got the man page for
zdump. Not cool :)
So I've gone through all the links and fixed them to point
I have filed 6439484 panic in buf_hash_remove due to a NULL pointer
dereference to track this issue.
thanks,
Noel :-)
**
"Question all the answers"
On Jun 12, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Daniel Rock wrote:
Hi,
had recently t
Out of curiosity, is this panic reproducible? A bug should be filed on
this for more investigation. Feel free to open one or I'll open it if
you forward me info on where the crash dump is and information on the
I/O stress test you were running.
thanks,
Noel :-)
***
Hey Darren,
I can't seem to find an RFE/bug open on anything that looks like this.
I'm behind in my email so could have missed the a thread containing
this explanation and info, but exactly what kind of option are you
looking for?
thanks!
Noel :-)
***
ZFS doesn't demand that the drives have the same capacity. If you
mirror a 30GB drive and a 40GB drive then ZFS will treat them as two
30GB drives, so you're effectively wasting 10GB of space.
Noel
**
"Question all
17 matches
Mail list logo
