ck online or rudely disconnecting
> them
> 4) once the kext is loaded it appears that any user can perform any
> action e.g. anybody can create or delete a snapshot or a pool
>
> Shawn
>
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:26 PM, Noël Dellofano wrote:
>
>>> As soon as I ge
x27;t be any
weird compatibility issues with the rest system.
Noel
On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Scott Laird wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 11:26 AM, Noël Dellofano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> As soon as I get in to work and can backup my sparsebundle to a
>>> spare
>>>
the glorious hours of engineering you're getting for one
upgrade :)
Noel
On Jan 9, 2008, at 2:19 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Noël Dellofano wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>> This is just a quick announcement to say that the ZFS on OS X port
>> is now posted for yo
, just one account, have you tried
> a FileVaulted account too? Or is that just crazy talk? :-)
>
> On Jan 8, 2008 2:09 PM, Noël Dellofano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> This is just a quick announcement to say that the ZFS on OS X port is
>
Hey everyone,
This is just a quick announcement to say that the ZFS on OS X port is
now posted for your viewing fun at:
http://zfs.macosforge.org/
The page is also linked off of the ZFS Open Solaris page under "ZFS
Ports":
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/porting/
This page holds the
Hey Robert,
No, all the code fixes and features I mentioned before I developed and
putback before I left Sun, so no active development is happening or
anything. I still like to hang out on the zfs alias though just
because I still luv ZFS and want to keep tabs on it even if I'm not at
Su
typo: there shouldn't be a leading '/' before snap1 in the example below. apologies.NoelOn Oct 23, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Noël Dellofano wrote:#zfs send -i /snap1 /tank/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > backup.out ___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discu
It's also worth it to note that I recently added a '-F' flag to zfs
receive for precisely this sort of annoying problem :) I meant to send
a heads up to everyone about it but had not gotten to it yet.
Basically, when you specify '-F' flag to receive, a zfs rollback and a
receive are done at
The zap is really speedy when it comes to file lookups in a
directory. If you're really concerned about performance, and
depending on your system you're running on, I'd probably recommend
staying below 10 million or so files per directory. Just since you'll
get fastest results when we can
you may also want to check out Eric Kustarz's blog,which is good to note if your're using storage arrays:http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/vq_max_pendingNoelOn Oct 16, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Torrey McMahon wrote:Ciaran Johnston (AT/LMI) wrote: [SNIP]With our current filesystem, we create two 5-di
10 matches
Mail list logo
