Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and IBM's TSM

2007-07-10 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
Does anyone know when IBM will fully support TSM so we do not have to come up with these work arounds? On 7/10/07, Steve Zinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another option is to set the TSM server to do a selective backup of the zfs filesystems. This is probably the least friendly of the solution

Re: Re[2]: [zfs-discuss] Solaris crashes when ZFS device disappears

2007-01-03 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
I agree this needs to be corrected and am glad to see that a bug was open for it. Do you know what the bugid is for it? On 1/2/07, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Nicholas, Tuesday, January 2, 2007, 10:10:29 PM, you wrote: > You may want to check some of the past posti

Re: [zfs-discuss] Solaris crashes when ZFS device disappears

2007-01-02 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
You may want to check some of the past postings to this list as I believe what you are seeing has already been discussed already. If I remember correctly this is a "feature" of zfs and is designed to protect the integrity of the data on the zfs file system. On 1/2/07, Willem van Schaik <[EMAIL PR

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Fix dot-dot permissions without unmount?

2006-12-28 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
I understand what you are saying and have had the same problem. I used the fix that I mentioned to fix this problem on 2 of my production DB systems. On 12/28/06, Jason Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I should clarify. Say I have a zfs with the mount point /u00 that I import on the system.

Re: [zfs-discuss] Fix dot-dot permissions without unmount?

2006-12-28 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
The solution that I am going to give you has worked on ufs and vxfs for me and I do not see why it would not work on zfs. Share out the directory that you are having problems with lets say /opt. Once its shared mount it to /a. Then you can do the chmod on /a then umount /a and you should have fix

Re: [zfs-discuss] System pause peculiarity with mysql on zfs

2006-12-07 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
You said you are running Solaris 10 FCS but zfs was not released until Solaris 10 6/06 which is Solaris 10U2. On 12/7/06, Jason J. W. Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Dale, Are you using MyISAM or InnoDB? Also, what's your zpool configuration? Best Regards, Jason On 12/7/06, Dale Ghent

Re: [zfs-discuss] weird thing with zfs

2006-12-05 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
The only time that I have seen a format return "drive type unknown" is when the drive has failed. You may just have another bad drive and want to try replacing it again. If that does not work you, you may have another problem such as a bad backplane or a bad SCSI cable assuming the drive is an ext

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Supporting ~10K users on ZFS

2006-07-03 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
I am new to zfs and do not understand the reason that you would want to create a separate file system for each home directory. Can some one explain to me why you would want to do this? On 7/3/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/3/06, James Dickens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 7/3/06

Re: [zfs-discuss] status question regarding sol10u2

2006-06-26 Thread Nicholas Senedzuk
I had the same problem.On 6/26/06, Shannon Roddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Noel Dellofano wrote:> Solaris 10u2 was released today.  You can now download it from here:>> http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp Seems the download links are dead except for x86-64.  No Sparc downloads.