istware.net/201005/opensolaris-zfs/115564-zfs-discuss-small-stalls-slowing-down-rsync-from-holding-network-saturation-every-5-seconds.html
>
> On 16 Nov 2010 00:20, "Louis Carreiro" wrote:
> Almost! It seems like it held out a bit further than last time. Now "arcsz"
>
tioned values lower than 12288 ms.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Khushil Dep wrote:
> Set your txg_synctime_ms to 0x3000 and retest please?
>
> On 15 Nov 2010 23:23, "Louis" wrote:
> > Hey all1
> >
> > Recently I've decided to implement OpenSolari
Hey all1
Recently I've decided to implement OpenSolaris as a target for BackupExec.
The server I've converted into a "Storage Appliance" is an IBM x3650 M2 w/ ~4TB
of on board storage via ~10 local SATA drives and I'm using OpenSolaris
svn_134. I'm using a QLogic 4Gb FC HBA w/ the QLT driver an
vered
> c7t0d0p0 FAULTED 0 113 0 corrupted data
>
> errors: No known data errors
>
>
> I have disconnected c8t0d0p0 but zfs reports that c7t0d0p0 has been
> faulty !?
Both disks read c7t0d0p0, not c7t0d0p0 and c8t0d0p0 as you have in #1-4.
Typo?
-
bols +
data_symbol_table. In practice this doesn't happen due to floating point
overflows and some other issues.
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_coding
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolar
I did see this, Thanks.
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 10:51 -0400, Christine Tran wrote:
>
>
> 2009/8/14 Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
>
>
> I am primarily interested in the theory of how to write a
> filesystem.
> The kernel interface come
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:34 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Louis-Frédéric Feuillette wrote:
>
> > I saw this question on another mailing list, and I too would like to
> > know. And I have a couple questions of my own.
> >
> > == Paraphrased from other li
ing in the UNIX envirionment
File Structures: An OO approach using C++
Database System concepts (More about SQL and how to implement Joins )
Thanks in advance.
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.
stem you
> use, the scalability will look more-or-less similar. For millions of
> files,
> ZFS send/receive works much better. More details are in my paper.
Is there link to this paper available?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
e ) for them to give more accurate
data.
Unrelated, what did you use to generate those graphs, they look good.
Also, do you have a hardware list on your site somewhere that I missed?
I'd like to know more about the hardware.
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
_
about SSDs that I missed in my travels?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
this a NFS sync issue?
Might a SSD ZIL help?
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
tion would only really be useful for home users or simple
workstations. It also could have some performance implications.
-Jebnor
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ny advantage to using ditto
blocks on top of raid-z(2)?
Jebnor
--
Louis-Frédéric Feuillette
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Is it a simple case of (1) issuing a 'zpool export pool_name' command, (2)
> shutdown, (3) insert card and move all SATA cables for drives from mobo to
> card, (4) boot and issue a 'zpool import pool_name' command ?
>
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
> http:
types
and run different sections of code based upon what it finds?
louis
On 06/17/09 11:38, Dirk Nitschke wrote:
Hi Louis!
Solaris /usr/bin/find and Linux (GNU-) find work differently! I have
experienced dramatic runtime differences some time ago. The reason is
that Solaris find and GNU find use
the next updatedb is run.
HTH
louis
On 06/16/09 11:55, Jose Martins wrote:
Hello experts,
IHAC that wants to put more than 250 Million files on a single
mountpoint (in a directory tree with no more than 100 files on each
directory).
He wants to share such filesystem by NFS and mount it th
everything works without problems.
Somehow there where problems with the windows name resolution without the
restart. Maybe thats becouse I used the wins deamon before?
Greets Louis Hoefler.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss ma
Ok I found a solution.
Thanks for your help.
svcadm enable samba wins swat
modified /etc/sfw/smb.conf:
[global]
server string = Unix-Windows share
security = SHARE
wins server = 192.168.1.2, 192.168.1.1
[apache22]
comment = Apache 2.2 share
path = /var/apa
wrong?
Greets Louis Hoefler.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
But what is the recommended way to share a directory?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Is it possible to share a folder with cifs without adding a zfs volume?
I also have not found out how to share a folder with zfs, is it possible?
If it's possible, how?
I searched google and this forum but found no answers to my question.
Greets Louis Hoefler
PS.: I hope this was the
Well, ignore my post, a kernel engineer would know. I had no idea you
could loopback mount the same filesystem into multiple zones, or am I
missing something? This would certainly be more efficient than using nfs.
Lou
James C. McPherson wrote:
> Bo Granlund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [Sorry for cro
You probably want to share pool/home as an NFS share then mount it in
the zones. The zfs file system itself can't actually be mounted to
multiple mountpoints, its not a shared filesystem like NFS or QFS.
zfs set sharenfs=on pool/home
then in the zones
mount globalzonehost:/home /home
Where "g
24 matches
Mail list logo
