On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 03:39:56PM -0800, Rich Teer wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009, Chris Du wrote:
>
> > I think I finally see what you mean.
> >
> > # luactivate b126
> > System has findroot enabled GRUB
> > ERROR: Unable to determine the configuration of the current boot
> > environment .
>
> H
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:55:57AM -0700, Ben Middleton wrote:
>
> As a related issue to this (specifically CR 6884728) - any ideas how
> I should go about removing the old BE?
I haven'd tried this on U8, but maybe the following hack I did on
sxce_125 to be able to go back to older BEs will
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:03:18PM -0600, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
> Currently, the device naming changes in build 125 mean that you cannot
> use Solaris Live Upgrade to upgrade or patch a ZFS root dataset in a
> mirrored root pool.
> [...]
Just ran into this yesterday... The change to get thin
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:24:35PM +0200, Tobias Exner wrote:
>
> there's no such property available.
> There's no entry in the manpages, too.
>
>
> bash-3.00# zpool set autoexpand=on testpool
> cannot set property for 'testpool': invalid property 'autoexpand'
>
> Maybe a problem of
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:51:59AM +0200, Tobias Exner wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> some months ago I spoke with an zfs expert on a Sun Storage event.
>
> He told it's possible to grow a zpool by replacing every single disk
> with a larger one.
> After replacing and resilvering all disks of this pool z
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 08:54:36AM +0200, Ross wrote:
> Ok, build 117 does seem a lot better. The second run is slower,
> but not by such a huge margin.
Hm, I can't support this:
SunOS fred 5.11 snv_117 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
The system has 16GB of Ram, pool is mirrored over two FUJITSU-M
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:04:35PM +0200, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> I am sorry but it says it is empty 2, it doesn't say it is busy.
>
Hm, maybe autofs is in the play somewhere, having put his hands on /home?
Sorry, coming late to this thread, so this may be irrelevant or ruled out
before...
But IIRC,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 07:31:49PM +0200, Richard Elling wrote:
> Kurt Schreiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:38:56AM +0200, Richard Elling wrote:
> >
> >> Vincent Fox wrote:
> >>
> >>> So I decided to test out failure modes of ZFS root mirro
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:38:56AM +0200, Richard Elling wrote:
> Vincent Fox wrote:
> > So I decided to test out failure modes of ZFS root mirrors.
> >
> > Installed on a V240 with nv90. Worked great.
> >
> > Pulled out disk1, then replaced it and attached again, resilvered, all good.
> >
> > Now
