Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS Predates Unix Time?

2011-04-20 Thread Julian King
On 21 Apr 2011, at 00:48, "Stephen Repetski" wrote: > Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969. > Which is the Unix epoch in the east coast US timezone... > Perhaps there’s some amusing little coding error in ZFS causing the 1969 > pre-unix time date? Just something amusing I saw today… > Doubtful, assumin

Re: [zfs-discuss] X4540 no next-gen product?

2011-04-09 Thread Julian King
On 9 Apr 2011, at 12:59, Sašo Kiselkov wrote: > On 04/09/2011 01:41 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Julian King >>> >>> Actually I think our figures

Re: [zfs-discuss] X4540 no next-gen product?

2011-04-09 Thread Julian King
On 8 Apr 2011, at 19:43, Marion Hakanson wrote: >> which peak at around 7 Gb/s down a 10G link (in reality I don't need that >> much because it is all about the IOPS for me). That is with just twelve 15k >> disks. > > Depending on usage, I disagree with your bandwidth and latency figures