Ahhh...I missed the difference between a volume and a FS. That was it...thanks.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
When I create a volume I am unable to mount it locally. I pretty sure it has
something to do with the other volumes in the same ZFS pool being shared out as
ISCSI luns. For some reason ZFS things the base volume is ISCSI. Is there a
flag that I am missing? Thanks in advanced for the help.
[EMA
Hi folks,
I use an iSCSI disk mounted onto a Solaris 10 server. I installed a ZFS file
system into s2 of the disk. I exported the disk and cloned it on the iSCSI
target. The clone is a perfect copy of the iSCSI LUN and therefore has the
same zpool name and guid.
My question is: is there any
Thanks for the continuing flow of information. I already have all of the
equipment. I'm actually upgrading my main computer to a new Core 2 Duo setup
which is why this hardware is going to the file server. I think I'm going to
try a 64bit install using the four 500GB drives in a RAID-Z config
Sorry about that, the specific processor in question is the Pentium D 930 which
supports 64 bit computing through the Extended Memory 64 Technology. It was my
initial reaction to say I'd go with 32 bit computing because my general
experience with 64-bit is Windows, Linux, and some FreeBSD. Gen
The original thought was 3 of the drives as storage, and one of the drives as
parity. So that would yield around 1.4TB of useable storage. I hadn't given
any thought to running 64 bit. This system is being built from the ground up.
I guess in the back of my head I had assumed it would be 32
Hello all,
Spent the last several hours perusing the ZFS forums and some of the blog
entries regarding ZFS. I have a couple of questions and am open to any hints,
tips, or things to watch out for on implementation of my home file server. I'm
building a file server consisting of an Asus P5WD2 m
