Indeed it was!
Thanks!!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I replaced a smaller disk in my tank2, so now they're all 2TB. But look, zfs
still thinks it's a pool of 1.5 TB disks:
nebol@filez:~# zpool list tank2
NAMESIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
tank2 5.44T 4.20T 1.24T77% 1.00x ONLINE -
nebol@filez:~# zpool status tank2
I see now that a detail in my first post was incorrect, one of the disks is a
1.5 TB-disk, so the pool is thus 4 x 1.5 TB. So zpool reports total space
including parity. It makes sense then!
Thanks!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-
I recently created a raidz of four 2TB-disks and moved a bunch of movies onto
them.
And then I noticed that I've somehow lost a full TB of space. Why?
nebol@filez:/$ zfs list tank2
NAMEUSED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
tank2 3.12T 902G 32.9K /tank2
nebol@filez:/$ zpool list tank2
NAMES
Got a curious message the other day.. that my tank is över 80% full and that
ZFS has deleted old backups to free up space. That's curious since I'm not
using the Time Slider for tank, only for rpool...
So what exactly did it delete??
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
So a full NTFS defrag should result in just a long sequential ZFS write?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi folks!
Thinking about running a WinXP instance in VirtualBox on OpenSolaris, using a
20 GB harddisk-file. However, I am worried about fragmentation... with the
constant reading/writing that WinXP does... will not the fragmentation of the
hardrive-file in ZFS be humongus??
Best regards, gigan
