Al,
> > Being a friend of simplicity I was thinking about
> using a pair (or more) of 3320
> > SCSI JBODs with multiple RAIDZ and/or RAID10 zfs
> disk pools on which we'd
>
> Have you not heard that SCSI is dead? :)
> While I understand you don't want to build a SAN, an
> alternative would be
Robert,
> It's not that bad with CPU usage.
> For example with RAID-Z2 while doing scrub I get
> something like
> 800MB/s read from disks (550-600MB/s from zpool
> iostat perspective)
> and all four cores are mostly consumed - I get
> something like 10% idle
> on each cpu.
===
But in the end this
Dear all,
we're currently looking forward to restructure our hardware environment for
our datawarehousing product/suite/solution/whatever.
We're currently running the database side on various SF V440's attached via
dual FC to our SAN backend (EMC DMX3) with UFS. The storage system is
(obviously
Hello,
I really appreciate such information, could you please give us some additional
insight regarding your statement, that "[you] tried to drive ZFS to its limit,
[...]
found that the results were less consistent or predictable".
Especially when taking a closer look at the upcoming rdbms+thum
