[zfs-discuss] Re: Samba and ZFS ACL Question

2007-04-10 Thread Jiri Sasek
3.0.25rc1 was released 2 days ago so the "final version" will be available soon. vfs_zfsacl.c module was tested soon so I think it is a question of 2-3 weeks. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensola

[zfs-discuss] Re: Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-26 Thread Jiri Sasek
It does not concern the ACL on ZFS but this represent the mapping of the ZFS snapshots to samba shares. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs

[zfs-discuss] Re: Samba and ZFS ACL Question

2007-02-26 Thread Jiri Sasek
Root cause is in the acl(2) call. ZFS implementation team does not implemented backward compatibility of the SETACL/GETACL/GETACLCNT functions of this syscall. Only the extended functions ACE_SETACL/ACE_GETACL/ACE_GETACLCNT are implemented on ZFS. The old ones returns (errno == ENOTSUP) on ZFS (

[zfs-discuss] Re: Samba ACLs en ZFS

2007-02-26 Thread Jiri Sasek
I am currently working (among the other problems) on this issue. I hope the module will be finished till the 3.0.25 will be released. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.openso

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS ACLs and Samba

2006-10-13 Thread Jiri Sasek
ZFS/NFSv4 introduced a new acl model (see acl(2) ...nevada (OpenSolaris) Solaris10u2). There is no compatibility bridge between the GETACL/SETACL/GETACLCNT and ACE_SETACL/ACE_SETACL/ACE_GETACLCNT fonctions of acl(2) syscall. Because this is Solaris speciffic (samba.org defines its internal acl