[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Performance Question

2006-11-02 Thread Jay Grogan
The V120 has 4GB of RAM , on the HDS side we are in a RAID 5 on the LUN and not shairing any ports on the MCdata, but with so much cache we aren't close to taxing the disk. You mentioned the 50MB on the throughput and that's something we've been wondering around here as to what the average is fo

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Performance Question

2006-10-31 Thread Jay Grogan
Thanks Robert, I was hoping something like that hard turned up allot of what I will need to use ZFS for will be sequential writes at this time. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://m

[zfs-discuss] Re: ZFS Performance Question

2006-10-31 Thread Jay Grogan
To answer your question "Yes I did expect the same or better performance than standard UFS" based on all the hype and to quote Sun "Blazing performance ZFS is based on a transactional object model that removes most of the traditional constraints on the order of issuing I/Os, which results in huge

[zfs-discuss] ZFS Performance Question

2006-10-30 Thread Jay Grogan
Ran 3 test using mkfile to create a 6GB on a ufs and ZFS file system. command ran mkfile -v 6gb /ufs/tmpfile Test 1 UFS mounted LUN (2m2.373s) Test 2 UFS mounted LUN with directio option (5m31.802s) Test 3 ZFS LUN (Single LUN in a pool) (3m13.126s) Sunfire V120 1 Qlogic 2340 Solaris 10 06/06