John Hoogerdijk wrote:
so i guess there is some porting to do - no O_DIRECT in solaris...
anyone have bonnie++ 1.03e ported already?
For your purposes, couldn't you replace O_DIRECT with O_SYNC as a hack?
If you're trying to benchmark the log device, the important thing is to
generate synch
Mark J Musante wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, John Hoogerdijk wrote:
i've setup a RAIDZ2 pool with 5 SATA drives and added a 32GB SSD log
device. to see how well it works, i ran bonnie++, but never saw any
io's on the log device (using iostat -nxce) . pool status is good -
no issues or errors.
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 14:15, Neil Perrin wrote:
Of course we would need to stress the dangers of setting 'deferred'.
What do you guys think?
I can think of a use case for "deferred": improving the efficiency of a
large mega-"transaction"/batch job such as a nightly buil
Daniel Rock wrote:
James Dickens schrieb:
tried it again... same results... restores the damm efi label.. disk
starts on block 34 not 0, there is no slice 2... that solaris
ijnstaller demands
can not start any track at block 0.. so i can't create a backup slice
aka 2.
This is a SCSI disk?
