On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Marion Hakanson wrote:
> Has anyone out there built a 1-petabyte pool?
I'm not advising against your building/configuring a system yourself,
but I suggest taking look at the "Petarack":
http://www.aberdeeninc.com/abcatg/petarack.htm
It shows it's been done with Z
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Markus Grundmann wrote:
> I think the "zfs allow|deny" feature is only for filesystems. I wish me a
> feature to protect the complete pool. The property is restricted to zpool
> commands.
>
> On my notebook I have created a pool with simulated drives (g
Hi Markus,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Markus Grundmann wrote:
> It's possible to enhance the properties in the current source tree with an
> entry like "protected"?
> I find it seems not to be difficult but I'm not an professional C
> programmer. For more information
> please take a little
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris)
wrote:
>
> When I used "zpool status" after the system crashed, I saw this:
> NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE EXPANDSZCAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
> storage 928G 568G 360G -61% 1.00x ONLIN
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Bob Netherton wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Jan Owoc wrote:
>> Yes, that is correct. The last version of Solaris with source code
>> used zpool version 28. This is the last version that is readable by
>> non-Solaris operating syste
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:14 AM, sol wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just tried to use illumos (151a5) import a pool created on solaris
> (11.1) but it failed with an error about the pool being incompatible.
>
> Are we now at the stage where the two prongs of the zfs fork are pointing in
> incompatible
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 30/11/2012 ? 15:52:09+0100, Tomas Forsman a écrit
>> On 30 November, 2012 - Albert Shih sent me these 0,8K bytes:
>> > I would like to knwon if with ZFS it's possible to do something like that :
>> >
>> > http://tldp.org/HOW
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Tomas Forsman wrote:
>
> I don't have it readily at
> hand how to check the ashift value on a vdev, anyone
> else/archives/google?
>
This? ;-)
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=how+to+check+the+ashift+value+on+a+vdev&l=1
The first hit has:
# zdb mypool | grep ashift
Jan
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Chris Dunbar - Earthside, LLC <
cdun...@earthside.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ** **
>
> I have a degraded mirror set and this is has happened a few times (not
> always the same drive) over the last two years. In the past I replaced the
> drive and and r
HI Eugen,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Secondly, has anyone managed to run OpenIndiana on an AMD E-350
> (MSI E350DM-E33)? If it doesn't work, my only options would
> be all-in-one with ESXi, FreeNAS, or zfs on Linux.
I'm currently running OI 151a7 on an AMD E-350 syste
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Tim Cook wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Jan Owoc wrote:
>> Sorry... my question was partly answered by Jim Klimov on this list:
>> http://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2012-June/008546.html
>>
>> Apparently
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Jan Owoc wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen wrote:
>> When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error:
>>
>> # zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0
>> cannot replace
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Trond Michelsen wrote:
> When I try to replace the old drive, I get this error:
>
> # zpool replace tank c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0
> cannot replace c4t5000C5002AA2F8D6d0 with c4t5000C5004DE863F2d0:
> devices have different sector alignment
>
>
> H
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Sami Tuominen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have raidz pool with one directory, which is not accessible. It only gives
> "Input/output error" when trying to access it. Is there any way to fix that?
[...]
> nas4free:/tankki/media# zpool status -v
> pool: tankki
> state: ONLI
Hi,
I have a machine whose zpools are at version 28, and I would like to
keep them at that version for portability between OSes. I understand
that 'zpool status' asks me to upgrade, but so does 'zpool status -x'
(the man page says it should only report errors or unavailability).
This is a problem
15 matches
Mail list logo
