Mike Gerdts wrote:
> This unsupported feature is supported with the use of Sun Ops Center
> 2.5 when a zone is put on a "NAS Storage Library".
Ah, ok. I didn't know that.
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W
___
zfs
ust be specified by a full path.
Could it be that "discouraged" and "experimental" mean "not tested as
thoroughly as you might like, and certainly not a good idea in any sort
of production environment?"
It sounds like a bug, sure, but the fix might be to remove the o
re:
http://blogs.sun.com/edp/entry/moving_from_nevada_and_live
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
_
in the area you're planning to change to help
give you some advice.
- getting a copy of the standards documents (most are on-line these
days; see www.opengroup.org) and figuring out what issues apply in
your case.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PR
tacting Sun's support group sounds like a good impulse, especially
given that you're using Solaris 10, and that's not OpenSolaris.
I don't see any problems exactly like this for U3 in the database,
though.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
bout that one file
system is that it has over 100K tiny files on it.
I'll do some more digging as time (and other users) permit.
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
me result.
> and does putting a " sort -r | " before the while make any
> difference?
I'll give it a try tonight and see. It's a "production" system, so I
have to wait until all of the users are asleep or otherwise occupied
by "Two And A Half Men" re
ame pool/sys/[EMAIL PROTECTED] pool/sys/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
zfs rename pool/sys/[EMAIL PROTECTED] pool/sys/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's not a matter of the shell script not working; it's a matter of
something inside the kernel (perhaps not even ZFS but instead a driver
related to SATA?) experi
show any errors of any kind on the drives.
- I read through CR 6421427, but that seems to be SPARC-only.
Next step will probably be to set the 'snooping' flag and maybe hack
the bge driver to do an abort_sequence_enter() call on a magic packet
so that I can wrest control back. Before I
y with the usual
complement of detergent and switch fabric softener.
Having _every_ file modification result in dozens of I/Os would
probably be bad, but perhaps not if it's not _every_ modification
that's affected.
--
James Carlson, KISS Network<[EMAIL PROTECTE
10 matches
Mail list logo
