>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:42
> AM, Ian Garbutt < href="mailto:ian.g.garb...@newcastle.gov.uk";>ian.g.gar
> b...@newcastle.gov.uk>
> wrote: style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
> solid;padding-left:1ex;">
> Having looked thr
Get a life
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Thats not easy for me, I have all the storage spilt up into the same size LUNS
so I can't allocate larger luns and the vdev (looking at previous posts) won't
give the raid protection.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing
Having looked through the forum I gather that you cannot just add an additional
device to to raidz pool. This being the case is what are the alternatives that
I could to expand a raidz pool?
Thanks
Ian
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Thats fair enough, pity there isn't a simpler way.
Many thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I was wondering if there is any way of converting a zpool which only have one
LUN in there to a raidz zpool that was 3 or more LUNS in it?
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http:
I believe the best practice is to use seperate disks/zpool for oracle database
files as the record size needs to be set the same as the db block size - when
using a jbod or internal disks.
If the server is using a large SAN LUN can anybody see any issues if there is
only one zpool and the datas
